ICYMI: Showing up at decision time

op-edMy latest op-ed, title above, appeared in The Virginian-Pilot Thursday. In hindsight, I think it was appropriate in light of yesterday’s firehouse primary in the 14th Senate, won by Del. John Cosgrove.

According to VPAP, there are 124,202 registered voters in the 14th. Using the results from 2012, I’d venture to say that roughly 60% – or about 74,500 voters – are Republican. Only a total of 2,052 votes were cast, considered to be a high number, actually.

2.75% of Republicans (and 1.65% of all voters) in the 14th made the choice for everyone else. Yes, decisions are made by those who show up.

June 11 is the statewide primary. The three top of the ticket races for Democrats will be on that ballot. Downballot races in Hampton Roads are Virginia Beach’s Republican nominee for the 85th House of Delegates, Portsmouth’s Democratic nominee for Sheriff, and two in Norfolk, both Democratic nominating contests: the Commissioner of the Revenue and the 90th House of Delegates.

State run primaries, unlike party conventions and caucuses (assembled or unassembled), are open to all voters, regardless of party affiliation. Of the four contests mentioned above, only one – the 85th – currently has a challenger for the fall.

Unless you are willing to step up and run yourself – and you have until 7pm on June 11 to file – the choices will be made on June 11. Now is the time to get involved.

Otherwise, don’t be upset with the choices on your November ballot.

My column appears in The Virginian-Pilot every week, usually on Thursdays. You can see the columns as they are published here, or navigate to them from the PilotOnline.com homepage by clicking on Opinion and then choosing my name at the bottom of the dropdown list. You can also see the columns by liking my Facebook page. Although my column appears weekly, I am not and have never been an employee of The Virginian-Pilot.

6 thoughts on “ICYMI: Showing up at decision time

  1. Cosgrove’s win only perpetuates the fallacy that Republicans are truly concerned in financial stability. The natural distribution of wealth is upset by the continuation of increased governmental leveraging, and more importantly, regressive taxation growth. Considering all households, whether labeled “rich” or “poor”, are consumers, the universe to have the availability to spend, save, and invest is exponentially diminishing. For example, in just 2009 through 2011, the 8 million households in the U.S. with a net worth above $836,033 saw their aggregate wealth rise by an estimated $5.6 trillion,
    while the 111 million households with a net worth, at or below that
    level. saw their aggregate wealth decline by an estimated $0.6 trillion.
    Local indications that disposable income is shrinking can be observed by the growth of pawn shop activity, pay day loans, and the new influx of car title loan outlets.
    As an independent, the only difference I can observe between Democrats and Republicans is who and how much to tax. But neither are effective in averting our continued wealth disparity, but very good at exacerbating it.

        1. Then why did you say, “Cosgrove’s win only perpetuates the fallacy that Republicans are truly concerned in financial stability”?

          1. Warren: Let me put it simply. My observation is the rhetoric and financial platform that is expounded during campaign season (promises), fails to materialize, or is in fact, voted in the opposite direction. All things being equal, I would have rather voted for an individual who supported a tax increase, than one who opposed yet voted for a tax increase, even though I was opposed to a tax increase. Hope that makes sense. It is synonymous with honesty and trust.

  2. That does make sense, yes. I supported California Gov. Jerry Brown’s campaign for president years ago. I disagreed with him on almost every point, but he was HONEST.

Comments are closed.